Menu
- Issues Overview
- Protecting Institutional Religious Freedom
- Religious Hiring
- Faith Leaders Protest Narrow Religious Exemption
- Religious Leaders to the President: Don’t Curtail Our Religious Hiring Freedom
- Misleading ABA Guide to Workplace Law
- Important Supreme Court “Ministerial” Employment Case
- Maintaining Freedom for Faith-Based Service
- Signs of the Times: Rising Washington Tide Against Religious Hiring
- Religious Hiring Struggles in Canada
- PBS Airs Religious Hiring Story Featuring IRFA President and Baltimore Rescue Mission
- Strings Without Government Money
- Are Faith-Based Rules Changing?
- Faith-Based Services and the Contraceptives Mandate
- Colorado Christian University rejects the HHS contraceptives accommodation
- IRFA Submits Comments on HHS Contraceptives Mandate
- Contraceptives Mandate Action Memo for Parachurch Groups
- March 2012 ANPRM About Contraceptives Asks Questions, Does Not Solve Issues
- Audio FAQ on Federal Contraceptives Mandate
- Protest Letter Sent to HHS Secretary About Two-Class Religious Scheme
- Faith Leaders Protest Narrow Religious Exemption
- President Obama’s Faith-Based Initiatives
- President Bush’s Faith-Based Resources
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 IRFA, Inc.
All rights reserved.
Contact Us
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 48368
Washington, DC 20002-0368
Copyright © 2024
Powered by Oxygen Theme.
The ACLU’s crabbed view of religious freedom
In its fundraising appeal for 2014, “Moving Freedom Forward: What You and the ACLU Can Do in 2014,” the ACLU, while professing its devotion to religious freedom, stresses (certain) individual rights over institutional rights in a way that diminishes religious freedom. “For most Americans,” the fundraising letter asserts, “religious freedom means that each of us is free to make personal decisions about whom to love, when and if to worship, and whether or not to have children–based on our own beliefs and free of government interference.” But extremists, the letter warns, “want to turn that definition on its head. They claim that religious freedom means they are free to impose their religious beliefs on the rest of us.”
And just who are those American religious tyrants? Hobby Lobby and other organizations that, on moral grounds, are fighting for the freedom not to include certain contraceptives or abortifacients in the health insurance plans they offer their employees. Catholic hospitals that do not perform abortions. Business owners who, while they serve the general public, including LGBT persons, decline to put their energy and talent to use to commemorate gay weddings.
Are these nonprofit and for-profit organizations actually “imposing their religious beliefs” on everyone else? In fact, whatever their public-policy views might be . . .
On the other hand, if the ACLU has its way, many of these organizations will be conscience-bound to stop operating or will be penalized by government or will be compelled to change their policies, against their convictions. So who is it that is forcing their beliefs on whom? The ACLU ought to defend institutional rights and not undermine them.